weLOG #51 When Nature Speaks in Court
- Joanna Arai
- Sep 29
- 3 min read
In recent years, a quiet shift has begun to take root—one that challenges the very foundations of how we relate to the living world. Around the globe, rivers, forests, and entire ecosystems are being granted legal personhood. Not just protected. Not just preserved. Recognized in court as entities with rights—rights to exist, to thrive, to regenerate, and to be defended when under threat. One of the most well-known examples comes from Aotearoa New Zealand, where the Whanganui River—sacred to the Māori—was granted legal status in 2017 after more than a century of advocacy. The river is now recognized as a living being with the same rights as a person, represented in legal matters by both the Crown and Māori guardians. But this isn’t an isolated case. In Colombia, courts ruled that parts of the Amazon are legal subjects. In Ecuador, nature's rights are written into the constitution. From India to Bangladesh to parts of the United States, similar frameworks are emerging. What’s striking is that many of these decisions stem from Indigenous ways of knowing—worldviews where nature has never been inert, never been "other," and certainly never been property. The rights of nature movement isn’t inventing something new. It’s re-centering what has long been known in many cultures: that rivers have memory, mountains hold stories, and forests are not resources, but relations. Granting legal rights to nature isn’t just a symbolic act. In some cases, it’s altered the course of development. Polluting corporations have been challenged, extractive projects paused. Communities have gone to court on behalf of a forest or river, shifting the burden of proof: not “Why should we protect this?” but “How will this harm what already has a right to exist?” Of course, this raises new questions. Who speaks for nature? What happens when the legal guardians of a river disagree? What if a forest’s “interest” comes into conflict with a town’s economy? These are not easy dilemmas. But they’re necessary ones if we are to move toward a legal system that acknowledges interdependence—not just individual entitlement. At its heart, this movement is a reframing. It asks: What if we stopped trying to save nature and started respecting it? What if the law evolved to reflect not dominion, but relationship? Because maybe the forest has been speaking all along. It’s just that now, finally, someone is listening. |
AROUND THE WORLD 🌏
by Joanna
INDIA: COFFEE FARMS SEED FUTURE FORESTS
In the shade of India’s Western Ghats, coffee farmers are doing more than growing beans—they’re growing the next generation of forests. On plantations where coffee is cultivated beneath native trees, a new movement is unfolding: farmers are gathering the wild seeds that fall during routine pruning and giving them a second life.
Instead of being swept away or left to decay, these seeds are grown in small on-site nurseries. When ready, the young trees are planted in nearby degraded lands—helping restore vital forest corridors, support pollinators and birds, and reconnect fragmented habitats across one of the world’s most ecologically rich regions.
What makes this story striking is how restoration begins not with policy or outside intervention, but from the daily rhythms of people already working the land. No costly tools, no government program—just attention, care, and the decision to treat what falls as something worth keeping. In a time of big solutions, this quiet seed-saving might just be one of the most powerful.
BEAVERS TAKE THE LEAD IN WETLAND RENEWAL
When a government-led restoration project stalled in the Brdy region of the Czech Republic—an area once used for military training—it wasn’t a new contractor or high-tech solution that saved it. It was a family of beavers. Without permission, plan, or funding, these Eurasian beavers began building dams across abandoned drainage ditches, unintentionally reviving water retention across the site.
Their instinctive engineering re-flooded wetlands that had dried out due to past land use, restoring a mosaic of habitats that are now teeming with birds, amphibians, and native plants. The result? A healthier, self-regulating ecosystem—and an estimated €1 million saved in infrastructure costs. Government officials, initially skeptical, now say the beavers achieved in months what years of bureaucratic planning could not.
It’s not just a feel-good story—it challenges the notion that restoration has to be managed from the top down. Sometimes, nature just needs to be left to do what it does best.
WHAT WE'RE READING
There you have it, dear friends!
Till next time!
Joanna Arai
💛
Comments